It produces 20 percent more greenhouse gases than burning our most polluting fossil fuel, coal.
Unlike diesel, blue hydrogen performs worse: it produces 60 percent of greenhouse gases upon combustion.
I was very surprised by this result
said Robert Howarth, one of the study’s authors. The scientist also noted that blue hydrogen is widely mentioned as one of the options for reducing emissions, but the new scientific finding fundamentally refutes this.
On Tuesday, the US Senate, with bipartisan support, passed an infrastructure development package that also includes $8 billion for the production of “pure hydrogen,” in which they also label blue hydrogen. US President Joe Biden has called the package a “key tool” in the fight against climate change, but in light of new research findings, this appears doubtful.
I don’t think we should spend our money on these fake solutions
Robert Howarth said.
In the United States, many companies operate for a variety of purposes “Green color“ – Created from water and renewable energy sources, hydrogen compounds – in production And the test. Many say they are They could be a good alternative to fossil fuels, but not that but blue hydrogen could play a role in the regulation created by the US legislature.
“Social media evangelist. Baconaholic. Devoted reader. Twitter scholar. Avid coffee trailblazer.”