Retail Crowd

Complete British News World

New report: This is how Soros affects the United Nations

A new report said the Soros Foundation is supporting UN special rapporteurs with large sums, and is partnering with a range of experts with NGOs. Let’s show you what it’s all about.

Political decision-making is moving more and more away from people and capitals, to some centers of world importance, most notably New York and Geneva. The distinction between the public sector and the business sector, which has been supplanted by the local and the global, is fading away. The main representatives of this world power are NGOs, which have a huge budget, a team of experts and, above all, a liberal world view, as the European Center for Law and Justice (ECLJ) wrote in its introduction. new meaning, which looks at the financial background of UN experts.

With all this, global NGOs can be more effective actors than national governments. Governments’ attitudes toward NGOs are usually determined by whether or not they share their worldview. International organizations such as the United Nations work closely with NGOs. The United Nations and other international organizations are increasingly funded not by member states but by other international actors, such as multinational corporations.

The main players in this regard are the Soros Foundation for the Open Society, the Gates Foundation (a subsidiary of Bill Gates), the Ford Foundation, the Oak Foundation, and companies such as Microsoft or Facebook.

The European Center for Justice and Justice report examined the situation at the United Nations Human Rights Council, as was considered by former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan.

The “crown jewel” of the international human rights system.

At the same time, the United Nations Children’s Rights Organization (UNICEF) received half a billion dollars from these organizations in 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) received a billion dollars in 2017, the Office of the High Commissioner for Refugees. It earned $540 million in 2020, the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) 77.5 million in 2019, and UNESCO only about 69 million in 2020 – just to name a few.

However, the report to be summarized now operates within the framework of the United Nations OHCHR (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights), i.e. the “special procedures” of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, and in principle the “experts” appointed on a “voluntary” basis. Founded in 1993, the agency is designed in principle to advance the cause of human rights around the world, largely through influencing international law, but also by issuing country and thematic reports. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights also serves as the headquarters of the Human Rights Council in Geneva and coordinates the United Nations “human rights system”, which includes six major sub-units of the United Nations and a number of lower-level organizations. The current High Commissioner for Human Rights is Chilean Michelle Bachelet, a former Chilean president and head of the Chilean Socialist Party.

READ  60 minutes of free Mother's Day talk at Telenor

So OHCHR has special rapporteurs and human rights experts who work for the UN on a voluntary basis for three years and either prepare a country report or some type of thematic report (women’s rights, torture, gender, whatever). In 2021, 45 thematic correspondents and 13 countries worked in the agency. these

The experts are essentially human rights and their reports are highly respected.

They are often used by international courts, such as the Court of Justice of the European Union.

Well, according to a report by the European Center for Law and Justice, between 2015 and 2019, 40 percent of the budget for these volunteer experts came from external sources, which means either a donation to a country or support to NGOs. But it is also customary to “support” the work of experts “in kind”, for example by having an office or paying employees salaries.

However, the problem goes beyond this: 63 percent of the Commission’s 2019 budget came from external contributions ($179 million compared to $105 million from internal sources). Most of the external resources were pooled by Western countries known for their predominantly liberal agendas, such as Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. But Soros, Ford, MacArthur, Bill Clinton’s crypto advocacy foundations, Microsoft, Counterpart International, and the Wellspring Philantropic Fund contribute to all of this.

moreover

Of the 222 human rights experts who worked on the agency during this period, 52 held positions at the Soros Foundation,

or at an NGO strongly supported by the Soros or the Ford Foundation. Of the 222, 135 had an academic background, many of whom were lawyers, NGO employees or even retirees.

Experts who spoke in the report said that from the basic salary, in fact, almost anything can be achieved, and those who cannot get additional resources for their work, can not really succeed. In this regard, those who know the world of NGOs, are familiar with it, know it and can lobby for support, have a great advantage. The differences are great, there are those who have no additional resources, and others who organize luxurious conferences on exotic islands on this topic from the NGO money they receive. In addition, experts with a university background are supported by their university – while the world of Western universities is highly politicized.

READ  Catalog - Science and Technology - Dogecin is now available from Tesla

In addition, external support for experts is neither transparent nor transparent, the report notes. They add that there are experts who were able to hire eight employees thanks to the support of the Soros Foundation, while others did not know any of them. Sponsors often provide funds for express purposes, which means that sponsored experts have to highlight the correct narrative in their reports. A reporter told reporters:

“I mean, if you get paid by the Soros Foundation, you do what they say.”

The Soros Foundation also openly admitted that it once wanted to influence an expert with $100,000 in 2017 to portray household chores as slavery in its report on contemporary forms of slavery. Urmila Bhora, the concerned rapporteur, also complied with the request, dedicating her annual thematic report to the issue of migrant women’s slavery in the “global domestic economy”. Incidentally, the leader of the women’s program at the Soros Open Society Foundation was Fionwala ni Olin from 2011-2018, who donated $7 million to radical feminist and pro-choice organizations. Then in 2017, he was scheduled to publicize freedom of counterterrorism and human rights at the United Nations.

The Center for Women’s Global Leadership (CWGL), a feminist organization at Rodgers University in the United States, is actively working to lobby for feminist issues at the United Nations. Melissa Upreti, a member of the CWGL Task Force, has also worked with the UN Anti-Discrimination Task Force. Previously he worked for a leading global abortion lobbying organization called the Center for Reproductive Rights. He is also active in the Left and Radical Democracy Organization. CWGL is funded by the Ford and Oak Foundation, the Open Society Institute’s Women’s Program, the Just Society Fund, and other organizations.

The report cites patriarchal oppression, gender stereotypes, the “toxic masculinity” that must be combated, and doctors’ conscience freedom not to require an abortion, quite simply honorably, as a form of torture against women.

Juan Mendez, who was a torture and cruelty reporter from 2010 to 2016, has received support from the University of Washington, Ford, the Oak Foundation, Soros, and the Human Rights Initiative. In 2015, the Ford Foundation paid him $15,000 to write a report on “Gender and Torture.” The report became a book (A Gender Perspective on Torture: Law and Practice), which was also endorsed by Ford and has already been cited as an authoritative text by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR).

This report is an excellent example of how NGO influence works:

READ  A previous message from Steve Jobs revealed that the iPhone nano is made

They financially support a UN report on a particular topic, which is accompanied by a statement by other experts, becomes an international publication, and ultimately serves as a reference in international courts.

The Report on Gender and Torture strongly supports the transgender movement, especially the lack of transgender exchange without surgery. In this context, the European Court of Human Rights has already ruled, with two judges from the Open Society Foundation network (Grozef and Mets), as well as NGOs working on the case (AP, Garcon and Nicot v. France) (Transgender Europe, Amnesty, ILGA). Similar phenomena appear in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, where two judges (Elizabeth Odio Benito and Diego García Sayan) can be linked to Soros, as do NGOs that appear in court – all referring to the Mendez report.

Lithuanian rapporteur Dainius Boras, who received funding from the Center for Human Rights and the Soros Foundation, promised to write his report in close cooperation with “civil society”, and it truly reflects the ideology of OSF, the Open Society Foundation. Also “traditional family values” as something discriminatory.
Tlalang Mofokeng, a health rights rapporteur since 2020, is a doctor who considers abortion a “sign of extreme self-love.” She is a member of at least eight African organizations that promote abortion, which are also supported by the Soros Foundation for the Open Society. The lady was honored by the Gates Foundation.

The Open Society Foundation provides grants to United Nations experts through the City University of New York, Rutgers University, the University of Essex, and a Korean University, among others. The Ford Foundation does the same through the universities of New York, Washington, Arizona, California, and Sao Paulo.

Reporters were often employees of the NGOs that had paid them in the past.

Of the 222 rapporteurs in their positions since 2010, 52 rapporteurs have been in positions with the Open Society Foundation or funded NGOs (Center for Reproductive Rights, ICTJ). Fourteen are attached to the amnesty, four to Human Rights Watch and one to the Helsinki Committee. During the reporting period, 41 rapporteurs also sat there in NGOs, even as decision makers, and some in several NGOs.

The Ford Foundation also spent $387 million on human rights in 2017, the Open Society Foundation $224 million and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation $173 million. Many institutions and organizations are members of the Human Rights Funders Network (HRFN).

The European Center for Law and Justice notes that NGOs are being privatized and human rights are being privatized.